Yes, authors can add notes to individual pages for internal reference or as part of the published output. These notes can be formatted and used to provide guidance to other authors, displayed in a pop-up window for instructor-led course formats, or even leveraged as variables to dynamically display page notes within the course and turned on or off, based on a specific audience publish target. This flexibility enhances collaboration, documentation, single source design and instructional customization.

Yes, the review workflow is fully integrated into the authoring experience. There’s no need to publish for review, as content remains live, and authors can see reviewer notes inline while editing. This ensures clear context for feedback, making it easier to understand and apply changes efficiently, streamlining collaboration and the content development process.

Yes, authors can control the review period by setting specific start and end dates, with review access automatically ending on the specified date. If needed, authors can adjust the dates within the workflow, and all reviewers will be automatically notified. This ensures a structured feedback process, keeps the content development timeline on track, and provides flexibility for managing review schedules.

Yes, reviewers can connect their notes to specific elements on the page, allowing authors to see feedback within context while editing. Elements like media, software simulations, tabs, and more automatically include details such as the current time, step, or tab in the note. This ensures precise, actionable feedback, making it easier for authors to understand and implement changes efficiently.

Yes, reviewers can like or agree with comments made by others. This reduces redundant feedback, helps authors identify commonly noted issues, and prioritizes revisions more effectively. By streamlining the review process, this feature ensures a more efficient and collaborative content development experience.

Yes, multiple resolution categories and feedback options are available, allowing authors to better organize and manage review comments. Resolutions can be applied directly within the editing environment, ensuring feedback is addressed efficiently. Additionally, optional notifications keep reviewers informed of updates, streamlining collaboration and improving workflow clarity.

Yes, reviewer notes can be exported from the review system in both text and Excel formats. This allows for easy documentation, offline analysis, and streamlined collaboration outside the platform, ensuring feedback is accessible and actionable.

Yes, additional review cycles can be run after the initial review is completed. Authors can set a new review period and choose to keep the same reviewers or adjust the reviewer list as needed. This flexibility optimizes continuous improvement and refinement of content based on iterative feedback.

Yes, review notes are linked to the object and will appear in all projects that reuse the content. This ensures consistency in feedback across multiple courses, streamlining collaboration and making it easier for authors to track and apply necessary updates efficiently.

Yes, the reviewer notes report includes multiple filtering options, allowing for efficient organization and analysis. Filters include status, note type, priority, author, and the language and audience target to which the note applies. This flexibility ensures that authors can quickly find relevant feedback, streamline revisions, and prioritize updates effectively.